| 
Training Ideas and Theory
by Jack Farrell, retired xc-track coach Summer 2002 courtesy of George Payan CoachingEducation.com
Many of the ideas I promote in training actually come from
the observation of adult runners, many of whom are
self-coached and have achieved significant success using
prolonged periods of steady-state running. I also looked at
the training schedules of professional road racers, those
who need to run 28 minutes for a 10k, week-in and
week-out, pretty much the whole year, with only an
occasional half-marathon thrown in. Their training is pretty
much the same year round. Only in runners who have
defined seasons, as in track races in the summer and
cross country in the fall, followed by some road races in the
winter and spring, will you find periodizing in their training.
The coached runner still relies on some kind of periodizing
in training, as in the long build-up of mileage over the
summer, followed by a reduction in mileage and attention to
repetition training, followed by intense bouts of speed, and
culminating in a period of rest right before the big
competition. This approach rarely serves adult runners and
I would argue is not even the optimum way to train runners.
The theory assumes that once something is achieved, it can
be banked. Thus the 1000-mile summer will still be there
when you need it in the championship race in November. I
would argue that the benefit of a base dissipates the minute
you stop paying attention to the base that is within 48 hours
of cutting back your mileage. The base is certainly gone by
November.
There is a bigger problem that periodizing training. The
training itself is based on the hard-easy approach, which is
definitely modeled on weight lifting. The muscular skeleton
system is exposed to a significant load and made to
over-work; then a period of rest follows where the muscles
repair themselves and over-compensate, thereby getting
stronger. The problem for runners is the main muscle
involved is the cardiac muscle and the real goal of training
is to increase oxygen uptake. I argue that the
cardio-vascular system best achieves fitness through a
gradual increase of training load. I think this approach
works for any runners but is particularly suited for adult
runners, many of whom already do this intuitively. The
principles then are the following:
1) Maximum fitness is best achieved by gradually increasing
training duration at a steadily decreasing training rate. [In
other words, over time, a runner gradually runs further (or
longer) as he steadily runs faster].
2) The rule of thumb for training, after a certain level of
fitness is achieved (after a month or two), is that the training
pace is about 1 minute per mile slower than the racing pace
(for 5 k). [As an example, an adult runner, after a couple of
months of training, who can comfortably and consistently
run a 7 minute pace on his training runs, can probably race
5k at around 6 minutes a mile. Likewise, a runner at 6
minute training pace, can race at about 5 minutes a mile.]
3) Never steal from tomorrow. Runners who run
themselves into the ground periodically in training probably
set back their over-all progress. Done right, a runner should
never be especially sore or dead-legged. He should feel
the same almost every day.
4) All runners train and race at about the same stride
frequency. That's why marathon runners on T.V. don't look
like they are running that fast, even though they are moving
at below 5 minute pace. The implications for training are
huge. Since all runners strike the ground under their center
of gravity, then an increased pace is the result of an
increased bounce. What allows an athlete to sustain a
greater bounce is an increased oxygen uptake, some
increase in muscle strength and coordination, and an
increase in running economy. Of these factors, the most
important is oxygen uptake, which is the goal of training.
The other factors are more by-products of training. [If you
want to test this theory, count strides. The best way to do
this is on a treadmill. After a couple of minutes of warm-up,
begin counting just one foot strike for 1 minute. You should
get a figure somewhere between 80 and 90 (that's a rate of
160-180 strides per minute). Use the treadmill dial to
gradually increase the speed. Once you adjust to the new
rate, count strides again. A runner gradually dropping from
9 minute pace to 7 minute pace over a 15-20 minute run on
a treadmill will find that his stride frequency stays the same.
What allows him to drop his pace is a greater bounce.]
The program outlined in the training on the coaches'
website is ideal for adult runners, in my estimation. And, as
I have already said, most are training this way already,
although intuitively.
One last piece of advice. What I observed in runners I
trained was the jump from 6 to 7 miles a day, produced the
biggest jump in fitness level and the largest drop in racing
times. After achieving and sustaining 7 miles a day, the
gains above (8 or 9, for instance) were not as pronounced.
My suspicion is that somewhere between 6 and 7 miles per
day, there is a threshold achieved that maximizes the benefit
to oxygen uptake.
Please feel free to e-mail me at
farrellj@vcss.k12.ca.us
Jack Farrell
About American Track & Field |
About Running Network |
Privacy Policy |
Copyright |
Contact Us |
Advertise With Us |
|
|