I was privileged to have been invited to the 8th International Conference
on Altitude Training, held at the JISS (Japanese Institute for Sports
Science) on the 20th and 21st October in Tokyo. There were mainly
sports scientists in attendance and Dr Randall Wilber, chief sports
scientist for the USA Olympic Training Centre in Colorado, and myself
were the only international guest speakers. The main language was
Japanese, which made it relatively difficult to follow some of the
presentations given by the Japanese scientists. However, I was able to
get a good impression of the work done by the Japanese scientists on
altitude training in general terms. In this report I will first outline the
facilities and services available at the Japanese Institute of Sports
Science. Secondly I will try to give a summary of the key points
presented at the conference.THE JAPANESE INSTITUTE OF SPORTS SCIENCE (JISS)
Following the disappointing results at the Sydney Olympic Games, the
Japanese Olympic Committee, with the assistance of the government
constructed the JISS to coordinate and direct Japanese sports science
and sports medicine programmes. Funding came from the Japanese
government and major corporations.
The building utilised is 7 stories high and houses an impressive array of
sports science and sports medicine equipment, as well as specialist
areas for training in specific sports. The abundance of state of the art
sports science and sports medicine equipment is overwhelming. Two
MRI scans and one CT scan, in the sports medicine department were
complemented by two x-ray machines and a fully equipped biochemistry
laboratory (including a facility for DNA testing). Two full time sports
medicine physicians and two full time orthopaedic specialists are
employed, with visiting specialists in dentistry, ear/nose/throat,
cardiology and ophthalmology. I noticed on our guided tour that most
sports training areas seemed to have multiple cameras, as well as in
built force measuring platforms. Our guide estimated there were
approximately 30-40 platforms sprinkled throughout the building,
including in the swimming pool. Currently a hypoxic tent-like structure is
being constructed along the length of one 50metre lane in the swimming
pool, to enable the swimmers to train at artificial altitude. The kayak and
rowing flumes were most impressive with extensive biomechanical
analysis equipment.
Altitude training features high in the research interest of the JISS and
much work is done in that area. On the 5th floor 72 dormitory rooms are
set up as normobaric altitude rooms for athletes to stay in. In addition
there is a hypobaric room, as well as a normobaric hypoxic room for the
purpose of sports science research. In the sports medicine area there is
also a hyperbaric chamber, which is used for research and for the
treatment of acute injuries. As far as altitude research is concerned the
Japanese are especially interested in the live low/train high model
(which goes directly against the international trend of living high and
training low). There is an environmental room to research the effects of
heat, cold and humidity. An extra large treadmill (3 X 4m) is built in the
human performance laboratory, surrounded by mirrors and cameras.
This is used in particular, by speed skaters (on roller blades) and cross-
country skiers, to analyse technique and also for (indoor) training.
SUMMARY OF PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE CONFERENCE
The emphasis of altitude training in the United States is on the live high/
train low model, as was presented by Dr Randall Wilber, chief sports
physiologist at the US Olympic Training Centre at Colorado Springs. He
presented all the evidence currently available on the benefits of living
high and training low. In his particular facility, located at 1800m,
athletes do their hard training sessions with the assistance of
supplemental oxygen to mimic the live high/train low model. His
research thus far suggests a significant performance improvement when
competing at sea level and few or no side effects.
Four cases of experience with altitude training were presented by
different Japanese sports.
The first was a 400m track athlete who finished 7th at the 400m hurdles
at the World Championship Athletics this year. He had done several
stints of conventional altitude training, mainly in the United States, in the
previous years, and presented his results and training experience. He
felt altitude training benefited him through...
1. an improvement in the aerobic metabolic system - through stimulation
of the anaerobic metabolism.
2. lower air resistance - higher speeds could be acquired over sprint
distances, with a subsequent improvement in technique.
3. an efficient amount of high intensity training of a shorter duration.
The second presentation was by a coach/sports scientist with the
Japanese Swimming Team. In Athens they won 8 medals, including 3
gold, 1 silver and 4 bronze medals. This result was their best in 50
years. Six of the athletes who won medals in Athens had done
conventional altitude training prior to the Games. The Japanese
Swimming Team have refined their altitude training methods in the
years prior to the Athens Olympic Games by using altitude facilities at
Flagstaff (Arizona), as well as in Spain. Their swimmers, on average,
trained 100 days per year at altitude, divided up over three sessions -
two camps of 4 weeks and one camp of two weeks. At the third and
fourth camps they tended to be able to sustain their sea level speed.
The third presentation was on hypoxic training using a normobaric
hypoxic room. 30 minutes high intensity training in a hypoxic
environment, 3 days per week for 3-5 days resulted in a reduced oxygen
uptake at a certain workload (improved energy efficiency) and
substantially reduced accumulation of lactic acid in blood, doing the
same loads of high intensity exercise, in a group of competitive cyclists.
The fourth presentation was made by an ice speed skater who started to
sleep in a hypoxic tent (16.4%) in 1995. He also did stints of hypoxic
training using a bicycle. Initially he had difficulties sleeping and
breathing. At that time he felt it affected his general training because of
fatigue. In the second year, things improved when he adjusted his
hypoxic training by using a stepwise training method and controlling his
heart rate. He would bike at 3 X 10 minute stages of progressive
intensity. Stage 1 was 3kp, stage 2, 4kp and stage 3, 5kp - all with 60
rpm at an artificial altitude of 2,200m. He felt his power improve through
this type of training. In 1996 he won the National Japan Championships
with a new record and finished 2nd in the World Championships in the
10,000m (long track). In 1997 he tried to reduce his oxygen percentage
in the tent to 15.4% but felt that it delayed his recovery. He went back to
16% following that. He fell sick prior to the Nagano Olympic Games.
Prior to the Salt Lake Olympic Games he stuck to 16.4% of oxygen in his
tent and only trained twice in the tent, just prior to the Games. He stayed
at (2,200m above sea level) until one week prior to the race and then
went down to Salt Lake City (1,400m). As a consequence, he finished
4th in the 10,000m at these Olympic Games.
There was a presentation on the construction of the altitude tent, along
the length of a swimming lane, over one of the 50m lanes. They have
just about completed the construction. Difficulties were encountered
with trying to control the accumulation of CO2 and chlorine in the tent
during use. Unfortunately this was a rather technical presentation done
completely in Japanese, so I am unable to give more information.
An interesting presentation was given by an occupational physician on
the dangers of hypoxia. Apparently in the workplace, in Japan, it is
illegal to work in an environment where the oxygen concentration in the
air is less than 18%. This is the same as an altitude of approximately
1,600m, which in altitude training terms, is a very safe altitude.
A presentation was given on the benefits of sleeping in an altitude tent
as preparation for an altitude climb. Eight males slept at a simulated
altitude equivalent to between 3,000m and 4,000m, for 8 hours sleep
per day. Several improvements were observed in hematological values
and physiological responses, indicating acclimatisation effects.
There was a most interesting lecture on the effect of oxidative stress on
hypoxia induced erythropoietic response. The hypothesis was made
that individual response to altitude training depends on the production
of erythropoietin. The mechanisms behind stimulation of EPO through
the hypoxia inducible factor 1 was outlined and the processes that can
interfere with this.
A study on the quality of sleep in athletes at a simulated altitude of
2,000m shows a poor quality of sleep. Interestingly, at 1,500m no
changes in sleep patterns were found (as measured by EEG
recordings). This confirms the safety of training at 1500m, opposed to
2000m.
There were several presentations on the physiological effects of living
low and training high (in altitude chambers). Training was done for
varying durations and intensities. In general, performance
improvements were found, sometimes with accompanying
hematological changes as well.
There was a lecture on the effect of living high/training low on
performance during supra-maximal exercise, e.g. anaerobic exercise.
Three independent studies were presented where small improvements
(1%) were found in events lasting approximately 50 seconds to 16
minutes. There was also an improvement in mean power during supra-
maximal exercise with 30 seconds (Wingate test) after 7 days of live
high/train low. The results suggest that live high/train low increases
anaerobic capacity and/or muscle buffering capacity with a resulting
improvement during anaerobic exercise.
There was an interesting presentation from a mountaineer who had
done an elaborate 3 months pre-climb period of altitude acclimatization,
through a mixture of sleeping in altitude tents, as well as exercising at
artificial altitude. No altitude sickness was experienced and he was
able to climb three successive mountains within 3 weeks that were over
3,000m high.
I did a presentation on the effects of intermittent hypoxic training on
performance, health and acclimatisation.
CONCLUSION
The JISS is an impressive facility with the latest, state of the art sports
medicine and sports science equipment, available for research and
testing. If used well, this facility is going to enhance Japan's chances at
the Beijing Olympics greatly.
New Zealand is not in a position to replicate a similar sports science
sport centre. Sport science and sports medicine services in New
Zealand are currently somewhat fragmented and coordinated and
structured research programmes in support of specific sports are almost
non-existent. This applies in particular for the method of altitude
training.
Worldwide, different forms of altitude training are now accepted to have
a performance enhancing benefit. It is interesting that two opposing
methods, the live high/train low method practiced by most USA athletes
and the live low/train high method researched by the Japanese, seem to
have almost equal benefits. To me, as a coach, this makes sense. We
need to subject our athletes to different forms of stress to enable them to
adapt their systems to a maximum efficiency level.
I will continue to advocate the application of the different forms of
altitude training throughout the year, by different sports. Access to
altitude training and simulation programmes in New Zealand is currently
somewhat limited and an ongoing research programme, non-existent.
A coordinated approach is required towards supporting individual sports
with altitude training and simulation programmes, support by ongoing
research.
My recommendation to SPARC is that a small committee of experts is
appointed to discuss issues regarding altitude training and simulation
for New Zealands High Performance Sports. The committees task
would be to come up with a set of recommendations and practical
applications and research needs regarding altitude training and
simulation.